Some people think that shops should sell the food items of the local market rather than selling foods from other countries.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this era of globalisation, variety of eatables are available throughout the globe, especially packaged foods. Some people opine that shopkeepers should sell only locally procured food items instead of selling imported food products. I agree with their opinion because by selling local foods shop owners can contribute to the economy of their nation as well as save people from becoming unhealthy.
If shopkeepers emphasize on selling local produce, like vegetables and fruits, they can help in boosting the economy of their country. This is because, demand of local products will rise with their increased sale, and farmers will be able to sell their produce at genuine prices to the vendors. This will increase their margins, and they will be able to earn more profits. When local farmers are left with more money, they will be able to live a happy and prosperous life. In agrarian countries, such as India, where majority of population consists of farmers, rise in their living standard means that country is economically strong. Thus, local stores can play a large role in making their country stronger in monetary terms by promoting local foods.
However, some people argue that imported foods can provide lot of choices to the individuals because they can enjoy non-seasonal fruits and vegetables during the entire year. I somewhat agree with their argument, but processed foods could be detrimental for the health of the consumers. These type of eatables contains many preservatives and additives. By consuming these foods, people could suffer from different kind of diseases. Recent researches have shown that processed foods can cause allergies and cancer to its consumers. Therefore, shopkeepers should desist themselves from selling any kind of imported food products that could be harmful for the citizens and promote native food products.
To conclude, shopkeepers selling local eatables can contribute in building their whole country economically strong. Nevertheless, imported eatables could provide lot of choices to the people, but at the cost of their health. I believe that shopkeepers should sell local foods only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-12 | singla_mba2007 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that the public libraries are no longer necessary, other believe that public libraries still perform useful functions.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people believe that everyone should be free to make their own lifestyle choices, even if those choices are unhealthy. Other people think that the government should intervene to influence people’s choices, for example by putting high taxes on unheal 67
- Some people think that shops should sell the food items of the local market rather than selling foods from other countries Do you agree or disagree 67
- In many parts of the world amount of garbage rubbish is increasing What are the causes of this What are the possible solutions 67
- Adults do very less exercise these days Some people think that showing sporting events on the television such as Olympics and World Cup tournaments can be the best way to encourage adults to do exercise Others believe there are other effective ways to do 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6528059739 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1697822036 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291901937245 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104548742916 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112021808647 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215565197666 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105537209211 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.