Some young people look forward to a year of travelling ,a gap year,before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons.For others this is an expensive waste of time .Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
‘Gap year’ is becoming a common phenomenon among young people travelling to distant place before they settle down with universities or work. Some regard this kind of travel as an opportunity to enrich their knowledge or develop their interests while others believe such travel is a prodigal activity. Although there is some truth to the latter, I opine that taking a gap year can be highly advantageous.
First and foremost, gap year enables students to have thime to think about their future seriously. Nowadays, there is a vast number of students choosing major or career haphazardly, which is mainly because they do not have a clear plan for their career path. Therefore, taking a gap year is one of the best way to help them figure out what they really want and they will not waste their time studying the subject or being stuck with the jobs they do not enjoy.
Additionally, the more the young travel, the more that they can learn. Taking a gap year offers the young the opportunity to witness more aspects of the world. By travelling to different places, they can experience the local culture and as a result expand their knowledge. Moreover, travelling can help them to improve their language skills or to learn a new one. For example, a student coming from a non English speaking country if spend a year in the USA or Australia can master English as well as a native one.
In conclusion, whilst it is true that some young people may waste their time and money doing nothing, many people will make the most of their time and gain valuable experience and memory that they can miss when going straight to work or study
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | anh801 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | linhlinh11 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-17 | namviet | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Ngoc Trinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | akorn99 | 89 | view |
- The pie chart sets out the difference in the units of electricity produced by fuel sources of Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 56
- The chart shows the changes 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- As most people spend a major part of their life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71328671329 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44926014352 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8850692952 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329903474088 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120107448964 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582498082506 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204753533317 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064378236221 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.