What is the most useful action for an individual to take for the protection of the natural environment 1 Leave vehicles at home and walk or ride a bike 2 Reuse and recycle waste 3 Purchase organic food in local markets Use specific reasons and examples to

Essay topics:

What is the most useful action for an individual to take for the protection of the natural environment?
1. Leave vehicles at home and walk or ride a bike;
2. Reuse and recycle waste;
3. Purchase organic food in local markets.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

With the unprecedented development of the modern society, people are increasingly exploiting the environment without shouldering any responsibilities. Hence it is imperative for we human-beings to protect our environment unless we will be at the verge of depletion of resources. In my opinion, I suggest that leave vehicles at home and walk or ride a bike is a feasible solution. My points and examples are given below.
First of all, replacing the use of vehicles with bikes or subway can effectively save the environment. As nowadays almost everyone possesses his own car in society, hence if we can all choose to go biking rather than driving, our environment can undoubtedly be improved a lot. For instance, a survey has shown that the exhaust fumes of vehicles have caused nearly 80 percent of overall air pollution, such as the emission of carbon dioxide and fuels. Thus if we can reshape our means of trip, our environment can absolutely be enhanced a lot. And then, as less cars would be used, less cars would actually be manufactured. Hence less resources would be excavated from the nature, causing less environmental depletion.
Furthermore, the act of reusing or recycling waste is time-consuming, which is not well adapted for today’s trend of convenient life. Sometimes we have to consider the proper method of treating every kind of garbage and litters, hence such this process needs us to spend a lot of time and energy to execute. However, as contemporaries have already been busy, no one would actually try to be engaged with such the inconvenient and tricky things. For instance, as for me, when considering to recycle the bottles and plastics, firstly I need to make a place to save them and then I need to regularly contact with someone to sell these bottles. And I even have no plans about tackling with these plastic items! I feel they are dirty and noxious and thus I almost want to abandon them at all! Thus compared to the measure of transportation aspect, it is really troublesome. And it is always much easier and convenient for me to just transform my way of going out rather than make a lot of environmentally-friendly plans in my life!
Finally, there might be problems about packaging and food waste when consuming the food. Even though consuming these organic food can bring external benefits to the environment, people might feel careless about the packaging that can still harm the environment a lot. What’s more, a lot of people often fail to finish their food completely, hence causing the food waste. In a word, one improvement can be gained from one side, several negative consequences might also be brought from the other hand! But that problem could never be happened in the solution I ‘ve proposed.
Within the comprehensive analysis of every side, reshaping our modes of transportation can’t be a better way to conserve the environment. It is a much more convenient and straightforward way that do not cause any additional costs!

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-18 地狱博士后 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 地狱博士后 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...thout shouldering any responsibilities. Hence it is imperative for we human-beings to...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e emission of carbon dioxide and fuels. Thus if we can reshape our means of trip, ou...
^^^^
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...olutely be enhanced a lot. And then, as less cars would be used, less cars would act...
^^^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... And then, as less cars would be used, less cars would actually be manufactured. He...
^^^^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ss cars would actually be manufactured. Hence less resources would be excavated from ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering recycling'.
Suggestion: considering recycling
...y things. For instance, as for me, when considering to recycle the bottles and plastics, firstly I nee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, still, then, thus, well, as for, for instance, i feel, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9620758483 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06656730637 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542914171657 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8430826188 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.380952381 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09523809524 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156510110744 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496485588323 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547340247302 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847716558226 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616656731005 0.0645574589148 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.