A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and
material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness, and trust, no
longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this modern era, a lot of changes have happened in one's perception of valuing another person's worth and standard. It is commonly believed that nowadays status of everyone is measured based on their luxurious lifestyle and existence of power and popularity within a community instead of traditional ethical values such as loyalty, trust, and kindness. I am in accord with the given statement and think that there is a need to acknowledge and respect the old-time golden values which were given an immense value by our ancestors.
The most important point in support of my view can be witnessed during job interviews. Although everyone gets an opportunity to showcase their talent in front of the selection committee, those with powerful connections, nepotism, and strong social status grabs the outcome in their favor. A similar scenario can be observed while admitting a child in a private institution. For example, people with hefty donations and strong influence are preferred over an ethical and deserving student.
Furthermore, gone are the days when a person with kind behavior was respected for all their good deeds in society. These days, one who has no bank balance does not deserve a hearty acknowledgment, despite contributing a lot for the welfare of society. For instance, it is often seen that those with grounded thoughts are mostly treated as orthodox and outdated in a group if one has a weak financial condition.
To conclude, it is an undeniable fact that artificiality and show-off have engulfed the thinking of our society, where ethical values are losing their grip day by day. If it continued, our generations will slowly get deprived of such successful mantras of life. Hence, as responsible citizens, it's our duty to bring this valuable treasure back into our lives by respecting those who possess these values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | Nyahmeo | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Enkh_bold | 67 | view |
- Long term international migration emigration and net migration from 1999 to 2008 89
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 89
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 78
- 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... era, a lot of changes have happened in ones perception of valuing another persons w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their good deeds in society. These days, one who has no bank balance does not des...
^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...f life. Hence, as responsible citizens, its our duty to bring this valuable treasur...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16611295681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82431890874 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2777676725 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162611584761 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051291991669 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312140054635 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899702402893 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507849332343 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.