Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced
The waste production per person has increased tremendously world wide over the last 50 years. While the paradigm shift of lifestyle and the elevated amounts of electronic waste have contributed to this serious situation, a systematic approach to this by authorities could alleviate the rubbish production to a great extent. This essay would detail on these causes and solutions of this problem.
The major reasons behind the escalated garbage masses are the change of living standards and the increased outcome of e-waste these days. Although the progressive industrial and commercial developments add sophisticated comfort levels, it has brought inevitable but high amounts of waste dumpings with them. For example, a family where all members do regular job, appears to depend on fast food and packaged items which definitely leave large amount of waste materials. Apart from that, with the flourish of electronic industry, the quantum of outdated/non-working gadgets has gone up and added to the e-waste segment. Most of these are radio active and harmful to human lives.
Unlike the bygone days, the government has to be smarter in order to curtail the serious situation waste increase. Firstly, a ban on non-biodegradable waste such as plastic in many sectors would alleviate the issue to a certain extent. For instance, paper bags, if used to pack the food packs, it would remove major content of plastic waste dumping. Secondly, proper waste disposal systems such as incineration units should be implemented soon by authorities. Mandatory norms for the business units to have their own disposal equipment would curtail the problem rapidly. Considering the anticipated losses due to pollution and health hazards, the financial expenses towards making a cleaner ambience should be allocated at a faster rate.
In conclusion, even though the waste accumulation due to change of lifestyle and electronic waste is on roaring heights, a systematic governance by the authorities appears to resolve the issue effectively. It is hoped that citizens would act accordingly, so that future waste management is done properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 78
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 61
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...n per person has increased tremendously world wide over the last 50 years. While the parad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...n per person has increased tremendously world wide over the last 50 years. While the parad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42900302115 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97773337743 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610271903323 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8713438622 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610726982117 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190841130889 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308477277305 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0406046821646 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347736187756 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.