The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by WCJ8.5 on Sat, 09/05/2020 - 11:06

The charts compare the sources of electricity in Australia ana France in the years 1980 and 2000. Between these years electricity productioA almost aoubled, rising from 100 units to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180 units in France.
In 1980 Australia used coal as the main electricity source (50 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydro power (each produeing 20 units) and oil (which produced only 10 units}. By 2000, coal had become the
iuel for more than 75% of electricity P.roduced ana only h~dro continued to be another significant source supplying approximately 20%.
In contrast, France used coal as a source for only 25 units 0f electricity in 1980, which was matched by natural gas. The remaining 40 units were produced largely from oil and nuclear power, with hydro contributing only 5 units. But by 2000 nuclear power, which was not used at all in Australia, had
developed inte tne main source, producing almost 75% of electricity, at 126 units, while coal and oil together proauced only 50 units. Other sources were no longer significant.
Overall, it is clear that by 2000 these two countries relied on different principal fuel sourc s: Australia relied on coal and France on nuclear power.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 78 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 73 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 67 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 89 view
2022-10-07 Blackcytrus 74 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user WCJ8.5 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... the years 1980 and 2000. Between these years electricity productioA almost aoubled, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '{' seems to be missing
...its and oil which produced only 10 units}. By 2000, coal had become the iuel for...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63831812663 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7340885519 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233720586305 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119027171183 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08270830759 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128623236863 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672216685127 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.