Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea.
Recently, the phenomenon of "Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that mass media might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the Internet can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the culture standpoint, the benefits of the Internet or media for young people can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of the young generation and online materials are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the Internet. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both promoting knowledge of youths and traditional media can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, using the Internet and media by young people might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of the young generation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the Internet can relate to the reality that the demerits of forming relationships can pertain to poor communication skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of media and the Internet were correlated positively with public relationships, the local authorities would ultimately address the problems of media. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of monitoring the use of the Internet by children.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of Internet and media for young people far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-10 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-27 | brandnewiman | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | SamiraTalebi | 49 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 75
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams because people can learn many useful skills How far do you agree Explain and use examples or your own experience 85
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey if adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 72
- With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give you 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62666666667 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31197155114 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9015979168 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.454545455 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364286838195 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122142284957 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947690323185 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212403196789 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383900668549 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.