Children engaged in paid work.
There is an opinion that occupying and paying for children’s employment is totally unacceptable. However, some argue that working at the early age is an ideal opportunity to garner the tacit knowledge and being responsible for themselves. From my perspective, I strongly believe that the plus point of being a working child equal to its drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is considered that children working could have a high risk of being discriminated against and exploited. The children might earn a lower salary frequently due to the unwarranted assumption of the employers that they are likely to be responsible for less workload, thus, the productivity is lower. However, the amount of work that each person, regardless of different age, has to do is analogous. In the long run, not only would be disadvantaged in terms of wages, but the working children are also underused. Moreover, it is thought that children are vulnerable to social vices because of an unselective and unhealthy working environment. This factor could lead to children leaving the academic system without sufficient knowledge.
On the other hand, working from a young age is likely a better preparation than other non-working counterparts in the future. First and foremost, the saturation of degrees has increased more and more and employers require them the experience instead of explicit knowledge as a prerequisite. Thereby, participating in the workforce at the early age, children have a chance to accumulate several practical skills such as time management or teamwork. They could also learn work ethics, which is a beneficial work experience for them in entering working fields later on. Furthermore, when children successfully participate in the work activity around them, they take pride in what they do and being more confident about themselves. For instance, a child who has the opportunity to work earlier is not suffered from experience deficiency as they get used to with the demanding of work.
In conclusion, I am not with the idea of children’s work in all the circumstances, but parental guidance. Therefore, it is beneficial to every child to gain knowledge regarding various aspects and implementing them in the desired field though paid works add experience at that young age.
- The following graphs depict the reliability of print and non print academic materials as voiced by undergraduates and postgraduates at 3 different British universities Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources such as the Internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 73
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and healthcare To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to work'
Suggestion: to work
...ment or teamwork. They could also learn work ethics, which is a beneficial work expe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2602739726 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08781344253 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2750942248 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.941176471 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4705882353 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341409484655 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114933260087 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052947827724 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213384006557 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494159855154 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.