Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
It is true that swelling traffic and pollution always become problem in every country especially in big cities. In this essay, I totally disagree about the idea to increasing the price of petrol to solve the problem of the things above for some reason.
In the one hand, the main advantage of this problem is to decreasing users of private vehicle. It is because if the fuel is fancy, the citizens will prefer to choose public transportation. Taken as an example, in japan if there's someone that want to buy a car, they're will obtain high tax, the limited parking area in high price for rent, and also expensive fuel. As results, japanese pick out the train, bus, bicycle or other mass transportation to going to somewhere. It is clear that increasing the price of petrol can be possible solution to solve the traffic jam and the intention of pollution in big cities.
On the other hand, the disadvantage of this idea it can causing the basic ingredients for food price rise.
It is due to they have to paid higher price for accommodation. For instance, in papua, the price of fuel is higher that the other province in Indonesia. Therefore, in papua price in everything has high price, especially the basic ingredient for food is expensive. It is no doubt that increasing the price of petrol going going to makes the citizens in difficult time to provide the food and probably the number of poverty in area also increase.
From where I stand, I don't believe increasing price of petrol is the best way to solve the problem of traffic and pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | heni Imroatul | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | sanjay marwaha | 92 | view |
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with the young people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 56
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 56
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ation. Taken as an example, in japan if theres someone that want to buy a car, theyre ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... theres someone that want to buy a car, theyre will obtain high tax, the limited parki...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ick out the train, bus, bicycle or other mass transportation to going to somewher...
^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...d, the disadvantage of this idea it can causing the basic ingredients for food price ri...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: going
...ubt that increasing the price of petrol going going to makes the citizens in difficult time...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...a also increase. From where I stand, I dont believe increasing price of petrol is t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68498168498 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61695913041 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4673709671 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3846153846 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260770783384 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955102458105 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100957666934 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171072235833 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110666288412 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.