The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third-year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.
The given bar chart details the statistical information stating how many international students further classified on gender basis from five different countries admitted in a Canadian college for two cores in computer science.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that females from all but one of the countries opted for the networking core, while most of the males selected the database core.
According to the given illustration, whilst about 7000 females from china followed next by 6000 from Malaysia, further 1000 less from Singapore, and only 3000 from Srilanka chose to go in the networking, merely 1000 men from each of the countries except Sri Lanka, which recorded two times higher enrollments, opted the same course.
Turning to the database core, more men than women showed interest in it. Besides, china witnessed the same number of men as women in the other course, 1000 less were recorded in Sri Lanka compared to 4000 from Singapore, 3000 from Malaysia, and just 1000 from France as against 1000 females each from Srilanka, Malaysia, and two-fold from Singapore, China. However, in contrast, France was the only country where all females opted for the database course. Finally, with 9000 female admissions, China led the chart, and with the least men admissions, France scored the lowest rank.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-27 | sumitra gautam | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | pris | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | fachryadul92 | 81 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | narsindi | 73 | view |
- The Chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 78
- The chart describes the amount spent on consumer goods in sterling pounds by the given list of countries on different goods
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart shows the components of GDP from IT and service sectors in the UK from 1992 to 2000 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, look, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26046511628 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54795435398 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.1185160706 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.571428571 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620732207742 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038244900233 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593603419511 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533840790074 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736704854397 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.