The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
The rendered diagram depicts the information pertaining the evolution of modern house and relative changes in foot structure, since 40 million years ago.
On a fleeting glance, it is vivid that the earliest stage of horse was known as Eohippus which was appeared relatively similar the size of sheep and had sharp four toes. After 10 million years, Eohippus developed into Mesohippus and slightly bigger in size as compared to previous spieces. They had three toes while middle one was being widest.
Moving further, Merychippus was the third in line of modern horses, similar in size with Mesohippus, but middle toe became more prominent while rest two started to shrink. At last, modern horses look twice the size of Merychippus and their feet emerged into proper hoof.
Overall, modern horse has gone through three main stages in order to become its current version, each stage show distinctive changes in the body as a whole
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 79
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 67
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...ructure, since 40 million years ago. On a fleeting glance, it is vivid that the...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
... developed into Mesohippus and slightly bigger in size as compared to previous spieces. They h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40396591422 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.707792207792 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.116666596 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14664868255 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616522069627 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059528234406 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884865151459 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585615087074 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.