Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a real difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The topic of how much individuals can actually contribute to the sustainability of the environment is debatable, however, it is only when each individual engages in actions relating to sustainable goals that it is possible to protect the environment. The main reason is that each person can contribute in their communities and the surroundings of these communities combinedly affect the environment.
Human actions affect the environment directly and there is sufficient evidence for that. Scientists have found that when humans reduce the consumption of non-renewables and other sources of pollutions, the environment recovers and sometimes even integrates into a more eco-friendly system. This is because in natural systems everything is used efficiently by something else and nothing is wasted.
On the other hand, the contribution of single human beings compared to billions of humans on planet earth might be quite insignificant to cause any reasonable change. Humans have not been able to find a good balance of technologies that does not negatively affect the ambience of their communities. Hence, even if we keep our houses clean but due to the individualistic nature of such actions, in general, the overall nature is damaged.
Many industries and companies have huge power over the resources in the environment and can cause drastic changes. If these large organizations are not careful, they might cause severe environmental damaged that might lead to natural disasters. For example, the Tokyo nuclear spill that caused millions of toxic waste to be dumped into the cities in 2011 was due to government inaction and lack of risk mitigation from the company.
To conclude, every human being must realize the extent of damage that their actions cause on the environment and build up coordination action plan to tackle the environmental problems both on a small as well as macro scale. It is only through a combination of individualistic and team effort that we can dream of a sustainable and cleaner planet in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-13 | Quỳnh Giao | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mayuri29 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | anna103 | 95 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | tahmeed1993 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-18 | khangnguyen12345 | 61 | view |
- Government around the world should stop spending billions of dollars on space research while there are millions people living below poverty line on planet earth. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think m
- Parents are the best teachers for their children. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some scientists believe that studying the behaviour of 3-year-old children can tell which children would grow up to be criminals.To what extent in your opinion is crime a product of human nature or is it possible to stop children from growing up to be cri 78
- Government should spend more on science and research rather than economic or arts sectors To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The topic of how much individuals can actually contribute to ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally contribute to the sustainability of the environment is debatable, however, i...
^^
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... environmental problems both on a small as well as macro scale. It is only through a combi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29938271605 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10899613345 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9966553968 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.076923077 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125655064497 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444194418439 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501852889727 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689132843648 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468666359889 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.