Pie Charts
The three pie charts illustrate the information about the changes in percentage of annual spending on insurance, teacher's and other worker's salaries, resources, furniture and equipment in UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Firstly, in 1981, school spent 40% on teacher's salaries which was highest expenditure among all whereas, 28% was spent on other worker's salaries. Additionally, 15% was spent on resources such as books and furniture and equipment. Only 2% was spent by school on insurance. Furthermore, in 1991, teacher's salaries increased to 50% while expenditure decreased to 22% for other worker's salaries. Whereas, 5% was rose for resources while, 5% fell for furniture. Only 1% was increased for insurance.
Secondly, in 2001, expenditure on teacher's salaries went down by 5% and school spent 15% on other worker's salaries which was rose compared to 1991. Similarly, the percentage of resource was fell to 9%. In contrast, 23% was spent on furniture and equipment which was increased significantly while, school spent 5% more on insurance as compared to 1991.
Overall, from the pie charts, school spent more on teacher's salaries and less spent on insurance while, some fluctuation can be seen for spending on furniture and equipment.
- Imagine a foreigner from developed country plans to visit your city What would he like and dislike about your city 63
- The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of modern lifestyle What are the advantages of this trend Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
- Line graph 67
- Line graph 11
- Bar graph 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001. Firstly, in 1981, school spent 40% on te...
^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...ol spent 40% on teachers salaries which was highest expenditure among all whereas, 28% was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33838383838 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88825750676 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449494949495 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.9937300686 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0660282925442 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272314175343 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640151938787 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748863982192 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877532849495 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.