Some people say that the vertical city is best where people live and work in tall buildings. others say that horizontal city is better where
there are few tall buildings. Discuss both sides and give Your own opinion.
As the population is rising at the global level, and the cities are getting over-crowded, the planners are in a dilemma as to which way to spread. The traditional method is the horizontal expansion in which cities grow outwards, whereas in vertical spread cities grow upwards. This essay intends to explain both perspectives.
The concept of “vertical city” is fascinating and attracting many people due to various reasons. In this building, a large number of people can be accommodated. As it is a fact that the population is burgeoning, by 2050, 75% of people will live in cities. The land is scarce, hence going for vertical towns seems to be a viable solution.
Secondly, such cities can be confined to limited space, and this helps to conserve the farm-land and green park, which is the heart of the community. Also, managing and maintaining waste, water supply and providing electricity in such a small space is an easy task. Additionally, such buildings are beautiful.
On the other hand, the supporters of the traditional horizontal building spread of the cities cite a host of benefits. Mainly such small rise buildings are better to survive natural calamities like earthquake. Also, to construct such massive buildings builder’s don’t need to have so many skills, whereas, those skyscrapers required a lot of knowledge as those buildings need to withstand an earthquake and wind force which is not every builder’s cup of tea. Hence, horizontal structures are economical.
Moreover, those living in horizontal cities are having a better quality life compared to vertical towns, as they have enough space to do their extra-curricular activities like gardening. Also, they are being exposed to more natural light, ventilation and even the competition is fewer.
To sum up, the present dream of people is to have an independent house, but sooner or later they have to move to the vertical cities to meet the growing demand of the population.
- You are unable to attend your friend s wedding in Britain In this letter Tell her what you think about her wedding plan Apologize for not attending Suggest a date for a future meeting 56
- You have an evening class and your teacher gave you an essay to work on for the weekend However you were not able to finish the essay Write a letter saying the following outline the subject of your essay what happened why you did not finish it tell what y 73
- Write a letter to your friend who asked you to give some suggestion to his son is coming to your country Tell him which city he should go to how he can get a job and how he can make friends 73
- An Australian company offers money to foreign students to study in Australia Write a letter to the company Introduce yourself Say what do you want to study How the money will help you 96
- tt is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects shouldn t worry about producing a building as a work of art Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e to various reasons. In this building, a large number of people can be accommodated. As it is a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...hquake. Also, to construct such massive buildings builder’s don’t need to have so many sk...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: APOSTROPHE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Consider using the plural form here: 'builders'.
Suggestion: builders
...so, to construct such massive buildings builder’s don’t need to have so many skills, wher...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.159375 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94936268275 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6570939941 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222368534159 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705180214577 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470677463325 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107206083474 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344343594498 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.