The world of work is rapidly changing, and people cannot depend on having the same job and working conditions for life. What are the causes of this rapid change? How can people prepare for their future work life?
In the modern world, rapid changes in job markets can deter people from attaching to one job or working environment for their entire life. This essay will discuss several reasons for this tendency and preparation that people can have in response to it.
A fast-changing labor market can result from some triggers. Firstly, the world of work is subject to economic and social uncertainties. In fact, due to financial crises, businesses tend to experience losses of profit and even file for bankruptcy, which may leave employees jobless. At the time, social fluctuations, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, have taken a heavy toll on worldwide workforces, who might have been made redundant or had to change their traditional workplaces. Secondly, the rise of cutting-edge technologies seems to threaten human workers in specific industries. Many international conglomerates, such as Amazone, Alibaba, seem to have established their human-free production lines, which may marginalize manual workers. Furthermore, even competent office workers may face the risk of being replaced by robots as artificial intelligence, which can have the ability to process sophisticated tasks that once needed humans to solve, such as big data processing, healthcare diagnostics, has emerged. Therefore, people seem unable to stay in the same job due to the economic, social instabilities, and the development of automated machinery and human-like intelligence.
Fortunately, there are several ways in which can help people boost their adaptability. Firstly, education is always the key to developing their competitive edge in the rapidly evolving world of work. Instead of confining themselves to a certain sector, people should have more exposure to a few promising industries, such as digital marketing, psychology, to acquire more insights and qualifications, which can guarantee them recession-proof jobs. Secondly, human workers should focus on emotional intelligence that robots fail to mimic. In fact, emotional intelligence is one of the most sought-after social skills in the fourth industrial revolution by employers since the skills can allow people to feel empathy for their colleagues, which can deepen their collaboration to achieve shared purposes. Thus, people can upgrade their breadth of knowledge and develop emotional intelligence to meet the future work trend.
In conclusion, job markets are changing daily because of the effects of the economy, society, and technological development. However, employees can self-improve to stay ready for those prospective work changes.
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 67
- Some people believes that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Some others however think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give you opinions 84
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Some others however think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give you opinions 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70649350649 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19703860272 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602597402597 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0722689548 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.055555556 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375921391478 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112975866165 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103067891114 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25862541233 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134774967069 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.