The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015.
It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015. Meanwhile, the cost remained stable among months from January to December in many years, apart from the year of 2013.
Starting at $350 in January, the prices of rice exports in 2012 increased slightly to about $390 before leveling off at around $330 over the period between March and December. While the figure for 2013 rose from $300 in January to approximately $340 in the next month, this number fell significantly to the bottom of about $170 in April. There was a minimally growth in $200 in the final year.
In contrast, the statistics of prices of rice exports in 2014 and 2015 was much lower than those of previous years. 2014 saw a neglectable reduction from $150 in the initial month to $100 at the end of the month. However, there was a small escalation in the costs of rice exports from $50 in January to around $100 in December.
The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015.
It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015. Meanwhile, the cost remained stable among months from January to December in many years, apart from the year of 2013.
Starting at $350 in January, the prices of rice exports in 2012 increased slightly to about $390 before leveling off at around $330 over the period between March and December. While the figure for 2013 rose from $300 in January to approximately $340 in the next month, this number fell significantly to the bottom of about $170 in April. There was a minimally growth in $200 in the final year.
In contrast, the statistics of prices of rice exports in 2014 and 2015 was much lower than those of previous years. 2014 saw a neglectable reduction from $150 in the initial month to $100 at the end of the month. However, there was a small escalation in the costs of rice exports from $50 in January to around $100 in December.
- It is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills than watching TV I agree with this idea for some reasons Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers As a language teacher I have seen stud 61
- It is obvious that nowadays there is an increasing number of people purchasing well known designer labels of consumer products While this trend can account for some primary reasons I strongly believe that this is a negative tendency There are two principa 78
- The graph illustrates the amount of energy for the production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000 and predicts statistics for 2025 Overall it is evident that the figures for US consumption and US production increased over the period from 1950 to 2 67
- The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable On the one hand w 78
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('minimally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
... bottom of about 70 in April. There was a minimally growth in 00 in the final year. In contrast...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 1615.20841683 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 191.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56020942408 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49790350953 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.127212993 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552598965267 0.244688304435 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256119672563 0.084324248473 304% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.267986349582 0.0667982634062 401% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41989733359 0.151304729494 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.259820553498 0.056905535591 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.