The idea that the behaviors of three-year-old children can tell us a clue about whether they will be offenders or not. While there is some correlation between law violation and human nature, several measures could be taken to prevent children from being an offender when they enter adult life.
It is undeniable that a high proportion of violators are concerning about their aggressive natures and their personalities. Scientists have shown that some genes are responsible for their anti-social behaviors. Therefore, observing the way a child interacts with other peers could help psychologists interpret their characteristics. However, it seems to absurd to condemn children as evil criminals at the age of 3. Parents have an enormous influence on children's consciousness during the formative years of home-life. For instance, if a boy is raised in a dysfunctional family, he will be likely to develop a hostility characteristic since lacking parent's involvement in the upbringing of offsprings.
Since suck issues are serious, there is a number of possible solutions to address these problems. Firstly, parents can spend more time to teach and explain to their children what behaviors are good to learn from. In addition, fighting and bloody scenes on movies should be restricted at home, because those actions can be mimicked by youngsters. Secondly, schools can organize extra-curriculum activities which involve team working in order to nurture sympathies among teenagers when supporting each other.
In conclusion, it is obvious that watching children's behaviors can predict their future unlawful acts, parents and teachers can deter this problem by a number of effective steps.
The idea that the behaviors of three-year-old children can tell us a clue about whether they will be offenders or not. While there is some correlation between law violation and human nature, several measures could be taken to prevent children from being an offender when they enter adult life.
It is undeniable that a high proportion of violators are concerning about their aggressive natures and their personalities. Scientists have shown that some genes are responsible for their anti-social behaviors. Therefore, observing the way a child interacts with other peers could help psychologists interpret their characteristics. However, it seems to absurd to condemn children as evil criminals at the age of 3. Parents have an enormous influence on children's consciousness during the formative years of home-life. For instance, if a boy is raised in a dysfunctional family, he will be likely to develop a hostility characteristic since lacking parent's involvement in the upbringing of offsprings.
Since suck issues are serious, there is a number of possible solutions to address these problems. Firstly, parents can spend more time to teach and explain to their children what behaviors are good to learn from. In addition, fighting and bloody scenes on movies should be restricted at home, because those actions can be mimicked by youngsters. Secondly, schools can organize extra-curriculum activities which involve team working in order to nurture sympathies among teenagers when supporting each other.
In conclusion, it is obvious that watching children's behaviors can predict their future unlawful acts, parents and teachers can deter this problem by a number of effective steps.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The idea that the behaviors of three year old children can tell us a clue about whether they will be offenders or not While there is some correlation between law violation and human nature several measures could be taken to prevent children from being an 73
- It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment While I partly agree with this tendency I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective On 61
- The graph illustrates the amount of energy for the production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000 and predicts statistics for 2025 Overall it is evident that the figures for US consumption and US production increased over the period from 1950 to 2 67
- It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill While many people oppose to this idea I strongly agree with this view On the one hand I advocate that reading 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ble that a high proportion of violators are concerning about their aggressive natures and thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11000485169 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676923076923 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3479060847 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48905520263 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14580673715 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193500801287 0.0667982634062 290% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308385949732 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.316260592692 0.056905535591 556% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.