THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999.
The graph gives information about unemployment in percentage terms in Japan and the US between March 1993 and March 1999.
They followed different trends because Japan’s unemployment rate was upwards while the US's was downwards. From March 93 to March 94 the percentage of unemployment in Japan increased substantially, however, in the period from March 94 to March 95 the rates fluctuated but practically never changed. In the US it kept fluctuating throughout the given years, but as distinct from Japan, it steadily decreased from 7.0% to 5.0% except in March 93 and in March 95 the rates fell suddenly not slowly.
In March 96, there was a dramatic rise in Japan’s rates but later it started to fluctuate again. In March 98 the rates reached the highest point when it was over approximately 5.2%. Throughout the years given in the graph, Japan's rates rose from 2.5% to 5.0%.
The all-over picture is that even though two countries followed the opposite trends, in March 1995 they both ended at 5.0% of the unemployment rate.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-02 | InamAli | 89 | view |
2023-03-02 | InamAli | 93 | view |
2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 67
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed 73
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music film in whichever way they wish There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this s 56
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it s important to do so What will be the effect if children are not taught history 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut later it started to fluctuate again. In March 98 the rates reached the highest ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98850574713 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75313151192 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1849221372 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.546170561827 0.215688989381 253% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252468222256 0.103423049105 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153633042138 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358455455514 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169637900073 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.