Bar chart for males and females percentage of a European country for 1995 and 2005.
The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of males and females for the subsequent year of 1995 and 2005 in different countries.
Overall, it is clear that the ratio of males for the respective stage of 1995 and 2005 was higher than the rate of females in all nations.
In 1995, 71% male in Iceland, which is higher than all the other places in terms of the percentage proportion, but the female ratio was 42%, which lies in the middle concerning other territory female percentages. Whereas, the percent of males to females for Australia, Switzerland, UK, NewZealand, USA is 57 by 27, 64 by 54 percent, 57 by 52 percent, 60 by 26 percent and 59 by 45 percent.
However, In the year 2005, it is seen that all the countries follow the same pattern of the male is to female ratio. To be specific, in 2005, the percent of the male is to female for Iceland, Australia, Switzerland, UK, NewZealand, USA is 83 by 53, 69 by 39 percent, 77 by 67 percent, 72 by 62 percent, 71 by 41 percent and 72 by 62 percent.
Interestingly, it is apparent that there was an upward trend of percent for both the male and female in succeeding term 1995 and 2005 in each country.
- The life cycle of the salmon 56
- Bar chart for males and females percentage of a European country for 1995 and 2005 67
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 89
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 84
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 60 by 26 percent and 59 by 45 percent. However, In the year 2005, it is seen th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 71 by 41 percent and 72 by 62 percent. Interestingly, it is apparent that there...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49765258216 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73825259743 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469483568075 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8944148973 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371678718636 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219822293 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118690126248 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270120958045 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104814449576 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.