Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is major problem. What are the cause of this? How can this problem be solved?
Influx of white collar jobs have prompted enterprises to lease the facilities in urban proximities thereby acting as catalyst to mass migrations of youths to these hotspots. From subway to rail-roads, city transportations to food joints, almost every utility in metropolitan has premium price tag thereby making life unsustainable for common man. For example, it is hard to believe that the cost of daily commute by bay area rapid transport in San Francisco is approximately $30. This essay will discuss the potential causes of the population burst in downtown and recommended approach to address the concern with both tactical and strategic view-point.
City councils and mayors tends to sponsor and invite multinational powerhouse to establish their footprints in the urban locations. Regulatory agencies offers office spaces at extremely competitive price points with the objective to earning corporate taxes to fund the annual city budget. For example, Facebook recently acquired 20,000 square feet of office space thereby moving tens of thousands jobs into already overcrowded Manhattan in New York City. Flourishing job market in the capitals have forced millions of youth to abandon the native home towns and embrace chaotic city life.
State government needs to step up and formulate the governing bodies to monitor and scrutinize job invasion in metropolis. In addition, agencies can offer incentives to enterprises thereby embracing remote working culture as an interim solution. In long-term, set up a consortium of public and enterprises to offload the jobs to tier II towns along with promoting local hiring. For example, Texas state government intertwined a bill in house to fund and develop cyber parks for enterprises in the suburban thereby relieving stress to already saturated Houston city. Strong and forward looking guiding principles along with timely enforcement is key to curtail the menace of overpopulation.
In conclusion, plethora of job seeker moving to big cities is an invitation to disaster and stress to resource management. Setting up the governing council with guardrail to dissect job location to satellite town is holistic long term approach to solve the problem. It is also recommended to ramp up the local hiring in these towns for all round development of country.
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that teaching music in schools is a vital part of growing up and the human experience whilst others believe that teaching music in schools is a waste of time and resources Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- With the increase in computer use many people feel that school do not need to put the emphasis that they used to on basic handwriting skills or mathematics skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes While other think it is a waste of money What s your opinion 73
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes While other think it is a waste of money What s your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended ramping'.
Suggestion: recommended ramping
...proach to solve the problem. It is also recommended to ramp up the local hiring in these towns for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43454038997 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93030651207 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629526462396 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8890665368 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.047521989524 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.015070133402 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265422481902 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0296922101963 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188651372928 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.