The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Multinational organizations can be found in most major cities around the world these days. working for a multinational company is thought by many to the most effective way to learn about different cultures. Although working for such a company provides the opportunity to mix with people from a variety of cultural backgrounds, I would argue that this is not necessarily the best way to learn about cultures.
There is no doubt that for some people, working for a multinational organization will enhance their understanding of other cultures. The first reason is that in a multinational organization one can learn about the customs and traditions of other countries through mixing with people from a different background who work in the company or in liaising with colleagues abroad. Exposure to other languages is also likely, something that gives a much greater understanding of culture. There may also be the chance to relocate to work in another country which would mean complete immersion in that culture.
However, there are a number of reasons that it is not necessarily the best way. Firstly, there is no guarantee that you will be the person who gets exposure to other cultures since it depends on your positions within the company. Not all employees have roles where they regularly mix with other cultures. Also, there are also other excellent ways to achieve such a goal many people these days travel the world, and this is an opportunity to meet and spend time with people from other countries. It is also possible to do voluntary work with organizations and charities that work in other countries, something that would mean you meet a mix of people rather than just those who work in Companies.
In conclusion, despite the potential ways in which working for a multinational company can result in contact with people from other cultures, I believe that it cannot be assumed it is the best ways as there are other options to do this.
- Bar chart for males and females percentage of a European country for 1995 and 2005 67
- The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 84
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 89
- The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...jor cities around the world these days. working for a multinational company is thought ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
...egularly mix with other cultures. Also, there are also other excellent ways to achieve such a goal m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9755351682 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82668409839 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474006116208 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0734936168 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343973544575 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133843393856 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771190581848 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236203795813 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204590012057 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.