Although there has been a large increase in the numbers of women who go out to work, women continue to do a disproportionate amount of housework and childcare. What can be done to promote greater equality between men and women within the home?
These days, gender inequality has been an urgent problem that could not be fully tackled in many societies for a long time. Consequently, this leads to the gender stereotype that housework and caring children are mostly women’s responsibilities even though women are now having more jobs. In order to address inequality among genders within the home, I will list out several probable solutions in this essay.
Firstly, companies and the Government should conspire and participate to the social change in gender equality by limiting the working time for the women or dividing the workload equally between two genders. A good example for this is that companies and offices should give female workers a privilege of coming back home early to give them more spare time taking care of their families. This approach in turn will help families and couples balance working and personal lives and have the ideal amount of time to take care both of our career and family.
Another method to address this issue is that the Government should take immediate action to change the gender stereotype by using media, celebrities or public events. For example, we can organize a contest which encourages people working in media create videos or short documentary films depicting women’s personal lives and current gender prejudice within home. With the help of events similar to this, media could deliver a message of promoting the greater fairness of the female and supporting women in domestic chores.
In conclusion, the Government and society should take advantage of media and the strength of various companies, thereby narrowing the gender gap between women and men.
- Some people believe that the arts should receive subsidies or sponsorship from government and big companies Others feel such spending is a luxury and that it would be better if it were invested in scientific projects Discuss both views and give your own o 90
- Do you think life will be very different in the near future 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- The graph below shows Twitter use by age group in the USA between 2010 and 2013 88
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27743902439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92225092878 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.209843968 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121296132776 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342271425335 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358073791932 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792143937828 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040214543981 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.