The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK
in 2009.
The pie chart shows what nursing student did after graduation in the UK in the year of 2009. While the table illustrates the percentages of graduates working in health sector in each position.
In general, the number of students who chose to work in health sector after graduating outnumbered other choices. Besides, A large proportion of nursing graduates worked as hospital nurses, while a tiny fraction headed to be health administration.
As could be seen in from the pie chart, the percentage of graduate students working in health sector as more than three quarter (77%), followed by 10% of graduates who did not decide yet and 8% of students who kept going on further studying. By contrast, the rate of working and studying students accounted for a tiny fraction at 4% and only 1% of students was unemployed.
Regarding the nursing graduate working in health sector, the proportion of students working as hospital nurses led the board at 70%, while the figures of graduates working as midwives and mental health nurses shared the equal rate at of 12% and 10%, respectively. Only 2% of nursing students decided to work as health administration and 6% left did not have the exact answers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | kevann | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | view | |
| 2023-03-21 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009
- school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aduation in the UK in the year of 2009. While the table illustrates the percentages o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94527363184 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77297027114 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3513192605 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220303121644 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126538079468 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125045628637 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177194978117 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129512118396 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.