Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities.
Discuss both view and give your own opinion
In the last few decades, people have a tendency to join some high-risk activities as sky-diving. It is argued that extreme sports should be restricted by goverment or people can choose any kinds of sport to participate. In my respective, I totally agree that there must be regulations on dangerous sports.
On the one hand, it sounds logically that a ban on restricting every single high-risk taking sports have to be publicized by the authorities. In order to reduce the number of hazardous accidents while playing these sports, people ought to wear protection equipment and follow the rules as guided. Moreover, some violence sports such as boxing must be minimized because their vibe gives encouragement to aggressive thoughts and expressions of viewers, especially young generation. However, banning these kinds of sports can place the athletics into the state of joblessness.
On the other hand, there are some beneficial effect’s dangerous activities. Firstly, playing these sports has an advantage on mental health like releasing stress after a hectic day. Moreover, the fact is that most of extreme sport broadcasts attract plenty of audience and viewer is undeniable. Secondly, people have a right to do anything they wish for. If people are willing to challenge themselves in a completely aspect, people are able to meet their own demand rather than forbidden by law.
To sum up, people can opt for their leisure activities such as taking part in extreme sports. However, it must be followed by official laws introduced by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
- The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transportation and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010 92
- The line graph gives information on the cinema attendance in the UK
- The graph below shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1973 and the price of black and white television and color television during the same period 84
- The line graph gives information on the cinema attendance in the UK
- As the number of people who live in cities continues to increase the number of children who are raised in cities also has increased Some people believe that raising a child in a large city brings many advantages Meanwhile other people claim that it has ma 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of audiences'.
Suggestion: plenty of audiences
...ost of extreme sport broadcasts attract plenty of audience and viewer is undeniable. Secondly, peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('completely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('aspect') instead of another adjective.
... are willing to challenge themselves in a completely aspect, people are able to meet their own dema...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble to meet their own demand rather than forbidden by law. To sum up, people can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.224 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8669035561 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3029538434 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296141616269 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916265823664 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564928296554 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171135995157 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721094300784 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.