the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cars owned by people living in Britain over a period of 30 years, commencing in 1975.
As can be inferred from the graph, while there were gradual increases in the percentage of owning 2 cars and 3 cars, the downward trend was seen in that of having no car. Another key feature is that possessing 1 car accounted for the highest rate during the period shown.
In 1975, the ratio of having 3 cars in the UK was lowest, with approximately 4%. This figure rose gradually to in the vicinity of 10% by 2005. A similar upward trend was witnessed in the figure for 2 cars, with which climbing from about 6% in 1975 to nearly 19% by the end of the period studied.
A downward pattern was registered in the proportion of having no car. To be specific, the rate of no car was about 44%. This figure decreased significantly to approximately 22% by the last year. Finally, there was a gradual fall in from 45% in the year 1975 to about 39% in 1985 in the ratio of possessing 1 car, before climbing considerably to 45% by the end of the period surveyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it positive or negative development 61
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1985 in the ratio of possessing 1 car, before climbing considerably to 45% by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40099009901 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61433482811 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.11740655 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221644823605 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923332135843 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502365715566 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138378464509 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441084417809 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.