Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security while some people think that they cannot always expect job satisfaction, a permanent job is more important.
A few people suppose that being happy from the job is better than having a less choice to lose the job with high level of security. On the other hand, some people reckon that permeant job is greater than hope to enjoying a job. In my view, job satisfaction is better than job security.
People do certain things to make sure that they are happy and make others happy too. In the addition, if a man or a woman is happy and confident with their job then they have the ability to continue the job for long time. Even more, if people satisfied with their job they will work hard to seize their future goals. On the contrary, if people hate their job and they don’t have a choice to quit their job due to the high level of security will provide them negative consequences eventually. Sine, with the lack of choice to lose the job they won’t be able to achieve what they want in the future and they might regret about this. Eventually it will lead to have mental issues as well.
Nevertheless, if people can’t enjoy job won’t achieve anything in their job. People won’t be able think about their job in a positive manner. At the end, they think that they had a nightmare. So, it is indispensable to be happy with their job. Furthermore, there are both pros, and cons by having a permanent job. People can get a good experience, promotions and increasing the salary are the main advantages but there are drawbacks too. Such as; permanent job might be boring, it won’t provide various experiences and people cannot embark new businesses.
To sum up, I strongly believe that job satisfaction is an integral part of our lives and it is better than job security as well. Because, we won’t regret about our lives if we happy with our job at the moment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-01 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-18 | Bhagya Diyagama | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | tangerinelinlin | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | sonamwill | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 64
- The table shows results of surveys done in in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage 73
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 78
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations others however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their job and they don’t have a choice to quit their job due to the high level ...
^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of choice to lose the job they won’t be able to achieve what they want in the fu...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ple won’t be able think about their job in a positive manner. At the end, they think that they had a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if we happy with our job at the moment.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, such as, in my view, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51724137931 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39757610587 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479623824451 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2785860043 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0555555556 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465334984031 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17386907676 0.084324248473 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934768669632 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306417833211 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777548069659 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.