More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that more people nowadays tend to spend money on buying top fashion brands with clothes or packages, buying cars from popular brands. While it has some benefits for the customers, I believe that it is a negative development.
There are several reasons why the top brands attract more people than before. The main reason is the reputation of famous brands that can help people feel secure about product quality. With people who seldom go shopping, they want to buy a product with high quality to use for a long time, so top brands are usually taken priority to opt for buying by them. Another reason, hoping to have a good business, customers bought products of popular brands such as a luxury car or watch to build a good looking. Therefore, it is easier for people to collaborate with partners.
However, it has some drawbacks that impact on society. Firstly, people waste too much money on expensive products, which are unnecessary. For instance, when Apple company releases a new iPhone, customers immediately buy this new smartphone even their old phones still can serve all their needs. Secondly, with the trend of buying famous brands, it will be created a distinction in the community. In school, for example, a student might give attention to the clothing or accessories of other students to make friends. As a result, students will divide groups that are distinguishable between rich and poor.
In conclusion, it seems to me that more people want to buy popular brands because of several factors. Personally, I think this trend has some drawbacks for development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | majhar | 78 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 84
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 78
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 79
- Advertisement are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64046260553 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3871288591 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324183918509 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977788061065 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819802638893 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202335913399 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691589157096 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.