The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of money lavishing in residences on six areas (housing, food, health care, education, transportation and other) in a single country in 1950 and 2010.
It is crystal clear that, in 1950 people spent notable money for housing and on the other hand by 2010 food was the most common area that people looked in to.
In 1950, it can be witnessed that 72. 1% of money spent on housing and it was the well-known category in this year. However, nation consumed exclusively 2. 4% for the healthcare and by the way there were slight contrasts (1. 1%) between transportation and other areas at around 3. 3% and 4. 4% of expenditures, respectively. Interestingly, it is apparent that education sector had 6. 6% of expenditures and food category merely had only 11. 2% of expenditures.
By 2010, food category witnessed an upward trend (34. 0%) nonetheless, there was dramatically decrease on housing sector (22. 0%) as well. It is apparent that education and healthcare had the same amount of expenses. On the contrary, transportation rose up to 14. 0% and other sectors increased gradually up to 19. 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Why should we encourage the art area 67
- The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have continuous assessment over the school year 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 64
- The table shows results of surveys done in in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, nonetheless, well, by the way, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87564766839 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07360901948 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.392052453 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 52.2777777778 112.824112599 46% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.7222222222 22.9334400587 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130713961601 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274345023476 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547034282235 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916681980196 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759524624413 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.25 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.84 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.