Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?
It can be true that in modern life web-based shopping is becoming more and more ubiquitous. However, this trend has an intense effect on environmental matters as well as the labor market.
On the one hand, the development of e-commerce may have negative impacts on the environment. For example, rush delivery, which is often essentially associated with e-shopping, is widespread in recent years. Firstly, it seems to me that this quick delivery increases the amount of carbon footprint due to the growth in the number of car trips. Secondly, a myriad of plastics can be generated from the process of packaging and distributing products. These redundant plastics, if not effectively treated, may cause serious repercussions including environmental pollution or global warming. Therefore, the more commonplace online shopping is, the more detrimental the environmental issues could be.
On the other hand, it is probable that the rise of shopping on the Internet has a positive influence on the job market. When commercial activities on the Internet are developing, the demand of inhabitants for purchasing goods and products tends to increase remarkably. As a result, not only does this tendency promote manufacturing industries and stores, but it also provides the unemployed with jobs such as sales workers or delivery people. In this way, e-commerce might tackle unemployment and boost the economy. Hence, many businesses and residents can benefit from shopping online.
In conclusion, web-based commercial activities are on the significant rise, and the environment, along with employment, tends to be profoundly affected by this movement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-21 | Mirajanecute | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | phuongphuongt1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 78 | view |
- The charts give information concerning smartphone ownership as a percentage of population in Denmark and by level of education from 2000 to 2010 86
- the graph shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one English school chose to study 78
- The graphs show the changes in the UK steel industry between 1970 and 2000 84
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 78
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53754940711 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14043497936 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4684811537 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164655923966 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490889447567 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378676146332 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920926587043 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218314903802 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.