The graphs show the changes in the UK steel industry between 1970 and 2000.
The first line graph compares three different indicators in terms of the alterations of the British steel industry and the second line graph depicts the number of workers who worked in this field during the period between 1970 and 2000.
Overall, the quantity of steel which was imported into the UK was always the lowest during the period shown. In addition, there was a downward trend in that of employees working in the British steel industry over the surveyed period.
In 2000, the amount of steel provided for the UK was exactly 200,000 million tonnes. By contrast, those for authentic production and imported volume were lower, at about 170,000 and 10,000 million tonnes. From 1970 to 2000, the figure of British requirement for steel plummeted to 100,000 million tonnes. Similarly, there was a tumble in the quantity of steel that the UK manufactured to roughly 80,000 million tonnes during the same period. Meanwhile, that for products which were provided by foreign supply witnessed a significant growth to hit its peak of 70,000 million tonnes over the shown time.
However, the figure for the second chart was totally different. In 1970, the number of blue-collar workers in UK steel sector was the highest, at roughly 50,000 people. Between 1970 and 1990, this figure decreased dramatically to only over 20,000 employees. Likewise, that fell gradually to its lowest point of under 19,000 residents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
- Nowadays more and more young people who need employment have to compete with older people for the same jobs Why is this the case and what can be done to solve the problem 84
- the graph shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one English school chose to study 78
- The charts give information concerning smartphone ownership as a percentage of population in Denmark and by level of education from 2000 to 2010 86
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 61
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...uthentic production and imported volume were lower, at about 170,000 and 10,000 mill...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, second, similarly, then, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15584415584 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46701597085 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1915024511 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247234240493 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973265550996 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836823240464 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165191256607 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662829923293 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.