the graph shows information about the languages that 13-year-old students in one English school chose to study
The line graph represents the numbers of schoolchildren aged 13
years old choosing who chose to take up two different languages.
Overall, the quantity of 13-year-old pupils learning French is
always higher than the figure for Mandarin during the shown period. In
addition, the figure for Mandarin has increased increases, whereas the
opposite trend is true for that of French.
In 2000, approximately 150 students who were 13
decided to learn French. In contrast, the number of juvenile
schoolchildren studying French experienced a significant decrease to
about 95 pupils from 2000 to 2005. On the contrary, after one year,
this figure rose slowly to 100 students. Meanwhile, that fell has fallen
gradually to hit a trough of under 95 learners during the period from
2006 to the present time.
However, the trend for teenage students in Mandarin Mandarin classes is totally different. Starting with only ten learners in 2000,
there was a plunge in the number of adolescents at the age of 13 who
wanted to master Mandarin to about 75 students in 2005. By contrast,
between 2005 and the current time, this quantity has fluctuated
slightly to top out at nearly 80 pupils.
- The graphs show the changes in the UK steel industry between 1970 and 2000 84
- Nowadays more and more young people who need employment have to compete with older people for the same jobs Why is this the case and what can be done to solve the problem 84
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 56
- The charts give information concerning smartphone ownership as a percentage of population in Denmark and by level of education from 2000 to 2010 86
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s who were 13 decided to learn French. In contrast, the number of juvenile schoo...
^^
Line 14, column 44, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Mandarin
...ever, the trend for teenage students in Mandarin Mandarin classes is totally different. Starting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19072164948 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76665864221 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.423405848 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.7 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185953624193 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704241213789 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589128736871 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521713822553 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610218381302 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.