In cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
With afoot progression and augmentation of societies, human beings are struggling with miscellaneous calamities. One of which is nothing but the exorbitance of traffic jams. It has been indicated this phenomenon emanates from some causes in conurbations. As well as to tackle these upheaval-causing issues, some panaceas have been put forward so far. In the following, all facets will be debated succinctly.
There exist two rife root causes for this foreboding problem. First and foremost, it might be said should each person exercise the private car, while precluding from availing themselves from the network of public transport, it intuitively leads to the enhancement of the bottleneck, and it is limpid this envisioned status quo will be escalated with exponentially producing vehicles. Moreover, the rule of infrastructures, e.g., the high performance of traffic light, the quality of roads, is irrefutable so that as long as they do not work appositely, overcrowding brings about.
To address these broached problems, there are some restorative ways. Firstly, if people take part in the communal car-pooling, and government procreates cars commensurate with the number of families, these can play as attenuating circumstances. To the best of the author's knowledge, when governments cut out the public transport fare or impose tax incentives, like what happened recently in Korea, the predilection of persons to use such transport surges. Furthermore, with more disbursement on the amelioration of the quality of instrument-related transport; accordingly, it gives rise to not merely civic pride but also the obviation of potential matters which may occur.
To briefly recapitulate, apart from aberration from public transport along with a penchant for personal cars among denizens, the malfunction of infrastructures in begetting congestion is irrefutable. And to solve them, it is possible to instigate people for employing public transportation via the elimination of fare and improvement in high-capacity infrastructures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after Other people disagree however saying that this depends on a child s circumstances Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion 100
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ating circumstances. To the best of the authors knowledge, when governments cut out the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, but, e.g., first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72368421053 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48417847616 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661184210526 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0510035162 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154777343374 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515327306396 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511205709613 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849605962745 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541843754972 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.