The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph how much different kind of meat and fish was consumed in a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
Overall,it can be manifested that beef was the most popular type of meat at first, it was replaced by the chicken towards the end of the survey . In contrast,fish remained the least significant throughout the period.
it can be seen from the graph that in 1979, the consumption of beef was the highest at around 220 grams per person per week. after that, the consumption decreased gradually to nearly 170 grams in 1984 and rose again in 1984, before falling dramatically to just above 100 grams in 2004. Similarly, lamb’s consumption decreased slightly over the period of 25 years, decreasing from 150 grams to approximately 70 grams by 2004.
By contrast, the consumption of chicken, which was 150 grams in 1979, increased steadily till 1999, after which it rose significantly and reached a peak of 250 grams by 2004. But, fish remained unpopular throughout the period with a little decline of 10 grams from just over 60 gram per person intake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004. Overall,it can be manifested that beef w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...n Europe from 1979 to 2004. Overall,it can be manifested that beef was the mos...
^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he chicken towards the end of the survey . In contrast,fish remained the least sig...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fish
...ards the end of the survey . In contrast,fish remained the least significant througho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... significant throughout the period. it can be seen from the graph that in 1979...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...t around 220 grams per person per week. after that, the consumption decreased gradual...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...e decline of 10 grams from just over 60 gram per person intake.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84699453552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70365550169 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0059889855 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138362743636 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073835542515 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768168499175 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113300138039 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927662866568 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.