In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend

Essay topics:

In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?

With afoot progression and augmentation of societies and science, the lifestyle of human beings is going through some upheaval-causing vicissitudes. One of which is occurring in the field of purchasing. Notwithstanding previously, people would tend to deem shopping as a perfunctory and quotidian deed, at this status quo, some take it into account as recreational activities. It brings about some positive and negative consequences per se. In the following, both facets will be covered succinctly.

On the one hand, those who are proponents of such the aforementioned change put forward after exponentially emerging large and small companies providing our desiderata, when people go shopping around, they face overabundant brands of products. Accordingly, they can highly likely consider foraging as a game for tracking down the best and apt materials. For instance, whenever one steps into a hypermarket, they encounter all sorts of potable and edible materials and can single out a garment appropriated to the invited ceremony with all rages of quality and price. Moreover, modern people to veer away from the tedium of their life and daily problems that they are overwhelmed into are essaying to substitute the routine task, e.g., purchasing, with a hobby. To this end, people tend to deem this task as a diversion.

Admittedly, it is true that people are regarding shopping as a hobby in lieu of a day-to-day duty, but they have to bear in their mind that they should not slack off in doing their duties. To elucidate it, should they procrastinate in acquiring requisite materials till getting round to doing it and consider this activity as a recreation, it may gradually influence other duties. So that they will get accustomed to behaving in other tasks similarly.

To briefly recapitulate, nonetheless, according to some, people have to attend to quotidian tasks severely and should not carry it over till finding a time for doing. I clearly declare that I go for the former idea, i.e., people should take it as a pursuit and it is an apposite style. Moreover, given this situation, it is recommended that people considerably pay attention to their health and as much as they can deem all works as a pastime.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-11 dorae 61 view
2023-11-11 dorae 61 view
2023-01-08 Elena2509 73 view
2023-01-08 Elena2509 61 view
2023-01-07 Elena2509 61 view
Essays by user ata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...d succinctly. On the one hand, those who are proponents of such the aforementioned c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t may gradually influence other duties. So that they will get accustomed to behaving in...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, e.g., if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, similarly, so, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14049586777 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04476638545 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584022038567 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7124047765 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157015611541 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500662333257 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488300825492 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915165699469 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213987306182 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...d succinctly. On the one hand, those who are proponents of such the aforementioned c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t may gradually influence other duties. So that they will get accustomed to behaving in...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, e.g., if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, similarly, so, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14049586777 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04476638545 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584022038567 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7124047765 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157015611541 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500662333257 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488300825492 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915165699469 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213987306182 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.