The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the proportion of British students of a particular university, those who could speak languages other than English in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the majority of students could speak Spanish other than English, which continues around a third in both given years. However, figures for those knowing no other languages halved, while remaining increased marginally.
Focusing on pupils who spoke Spanish and French, they make up nearly a half in both the noted period. The former increased by 5% from 30 to 35 percent, the latter grew in similar proportion to a 20 percent, in 2010. In contrast, students who spoke no languages apart from English dropped by half from 20 percent in 2000 to 10 percent by the end, in 2010.
On the other hand, with regards to those speaking German, the figures remained the same with 10 percent. Moreover, interestingly students knowing any other languages than mentioned vanished by the period whereas a 5 percent growth is reported to students speaking two different languages in addition to English.
- The number of residents and nonresident visitors to the city centre 78
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 63
- the graphs shows internet usage in taiwan by age group year 1998 2000 73
- The graph shows average C02 emission per person in UK Sweden Itlay and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The carbon emission per person in UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, third, whereas, while, apart from, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09604519774 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63060942979 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1574936873 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314983967844 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142525781027 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117326677333 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220857071608 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112960043904 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.