The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The two pie charts give information about the amount of energy produced from different sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, coal constituted the main source of energy production in both years, while others produced the least. There was a sharp decrease in the production of petrol, whereas an increase can be seen in the figures for other kinds of energy.
The amount of energy produced by coal in 1995 accounted for nearly a third of the total output before experiencing a rise to 30.93% in a decade. In contrast, other types of energy made up a small fraction (nearly 5%) in 1995, then, this figure rose dramatically to 9.10%
The energy generated by gas was the second-largest source of energy in France both year, with the corresponding figures in two years was 29.63% and 30.31% respectively. On the contrary, production by petrol witnessed a significant decrease by 10% to approximately one-fifth of the total energy generated in the year later. Meanwhile, there was also an upward trend in the proportion of energy produced from nuclear as the figures went up from 6.4% to 10.10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The best way that a government can reduce the traffic congestion in cities is to provide public transport free of cost to people 24 hours a day and 7 days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that cars should be banned in big city centers Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80830491272 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7665958131 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254932675952 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118076676909 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838617384268 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16051874606 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900373934452 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.