Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is often thought that, the majority of people prefer to work in one company in their essential whole lifetime of employment besides, other groups of individuals would like to work a range of assotciations to get qualification.
On the one hand, same company have a strong ability to private the sufficient and competitive salary to their employees in all their working life. As an illustration, the number of Chinese people do not need to seek identical work places to improve the quality of skill as they constantly mobilize different stuffs to take qualification by working same corporation. In my opinion, humans can able to create beneficial path and career without working a variety of companies.
On the other hand, there are many who work a range of organisations to generate their force for getting the amount of knowledge and experience. In my view, it is one of the best way to reach the highest position in the humans’ brief life. For instance, the proportion of irlandians have proven to be a permonant humans in the temporary world. They can have to the ability to invest different approaches for earning enough wage and getting skill by subscribing three work place to analyse working system. This action will be depended the greatest strength in a time. Last point that, whenever people enable to work for different corporations, they will avoid to replace same position also worldview compared to devote rest of the time to same organization. I believe that, the percentage of people should try to work in different places in order to gather their skill and experience is a more sensible to live the greatest degree.
In conclusion, although working for one company particularly true in sector that value experience also, can create a comfort zone and a best rapport with colleagues in all their working life. However, employing for unassotciated corporations are much more accessible, faster approach to reach high system in a work- specialisation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 92
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 2010 78
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2021 73
- The chart gives data about the number of students giving good ratings in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ef life. For instance, the proportion of irlandians have proven to be a permonant...
^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid replacing'.
Suggestion: avoid replacing
...k for different corporations, they will avoid to replace same position also worldview compared t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...nce also, can create a comfort zone and a best rapport with colleagues in all the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0736196319 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94403748174 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7825449054 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393195305474 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14033209026 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659095355205 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247831361022 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455329779862 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.