Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
Generally, the wastage of several items on a daily basis is a common trait of most human beings. Be it clothes, personal items or hardware, a lot of the surplus and unnecessary portions of such objects are easily thrown away; and food tops this list. The wastage of food can be boiled down to two primary reasons: trying new cuisines and buying more than it is required. Consequently, when a plate of food does not satisfy a person or suffices too much, the food is wasted. Since this trend has increased drastically in the last few years, several measures have also been taken up by both the government and NGOs. In this essay, I will discuss about both the ends of the spectrum.
As mentioned previously, people tend to waste food specifically when they are trying to improve their palates. A person consuming a certain cuisine for the first time always miscalculates the required portion, often leading to an unintentional purchase of extra food. When he or she is appalled by the taste, the food is completely discarded. Similarly, purchase of extra food is common even with known, everyday cuisines. People often buy more portions of food than he or she requires; this results in wastage when consumption is not possible.
Another trend is the ignorance of expiry dates for stored foods and dairy products. People frequently forget to examine the expiry dates of such food items during their purchase. A few days later when they think of consuming the product, they realise that it has expired, despite being refrigerated. Such a habit is quite common for yoghurts, cheese and milk.
Most major societal issues come with a solution and food wastage is not an exception. Before launching drives and organisations for the collection of excess food, awareness needs to be spread like a wildfire. Most people are unaware of donation centres where food can be donated without any hassle. People also require education and the role they can play in eliminating problems like world hunger and poverty, especially in countries like India where starvation is common.
People must also take measures to purchase smaller amounts of food and avoid unnecessary splurges. Buy only what is absolutely required and do a taste test before ordering the entire meal. Every grain of food holds the significance of saving lives. The idea is to be cautious and considerate of every faction of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97263681592 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64348752342 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564676616915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4038697879 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8636363636 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339085124107 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962209262054 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579926907258 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1837498075 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252477459236 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.