Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organizations.
Well, every person is various than others. Maybe someone prefer to work for the same company in her or his way of life. And others prefer to change jobs frequently. This choice is up to each individual.
First of all work for the same organization would be beneficial. Because if the employee works for same organization for many years he will be a more professional and knowledgeable worker than news. As a consequence, they will be always selected to the competent works. Therefore, it is apparent that these employees can expect stable progress in their professional life.
For example, a professor working for the same university and getting involved similar researches would be preferred for bigger research work than those professor who have worked for many organizations in different positions.
On the other hand, some workers consider that altering their workplace promote career advancement. These type of individuals can assemble various informations and work experiences from different organizations. And this will help them to improve their work skills. This knowledge will not only help them to attract employers towards them but also help them to convince these employers for paying them higher wages.
For instance, a software developer expert in different platforms and programming languages are better suited for large software companies and their careers often include working in different companies.
After analyzing these two outlooks it can be assumed that sticking to one company for all life can give a chance for great successes, but changing companies can benefit both personal and professional life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-10 | monmon12345 | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | mayaaminova03 | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | kallgou | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | Verawaty | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Nomuka | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking are security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening 87
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organizations 81
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
... is various than others. Maybe someone prefer to work for the same company in her or ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will always be
...orker than news. As a consequence, they will be always selected to the competent works. Theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this professor' or 'those professors'?
Suggestion: this professor; those professors
...preferred for bigger research work than those professor who have worked for many organizations ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can give a chance for great successes, but changing companies can benefit both ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87027213517 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.5972496626 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490131892387 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154748278306 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140715218951 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248832445409 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103768146978 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.