Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
In this developing world, there is a wide range of skills and features that people have to obtain to provide a better life for themselves. There is a big debate between individuals that which features are talents and which of them are skills. One of the vital ways to provide a successful life is knowing how to be a good leader. I think it is not an inborn feature and can be achievable by people’s effort. I have two reasons for my point of view that I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First, People are born with a combination of positive and negative inheritable attributes, but experiences are shown that everyone can strengthen his ability in various aspects of his personality even he was too weak in that background at first. By progress in psychological science, not only there are useful tips to help people to delete harmful features from their life, but also there are various ways to teach them how can handle a particular aspect of life. One of these beneficial skills is being a good leadership. A lot of effective courses are held by experts in this context. So people by participating in these classes and studying relative books can overcome their obstacles to be a great header.
Secondly, there are a lot of people that could not be good enough in a particular subject in their childhood or even their youngsters, but they convert to a professional person in that subject in future. It shows that it is plausible for everyone that could not be successful in especial time because of some reasons or problems. But by getting rid of difficulties and practicing, every goal is reachable. For instance, when my father was a student, he did not have a good performance, especially in group works; because he liked to do his tasks alone. After his education, when he started his job, he found it as a key way to work in a group. So he improved his ability in this unique subject. As a result, now he is a good manager in his company and enjoys his work.
In conclusion, there are so many ways to be a powerful leader, and it is not a characteristic feature at all. Because by helping valuable sources like training courses or articles and trying to solve relevant problems, being a great headship is possible.
- some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade they get 60
- if people have a opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for the job that is more satisfying 76
- movie and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistake than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 60
- to success in future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...vital ways to provide a successful life is knowing how to be a good leader. I think it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...vital ways to provide a successful life is knowing how to be a good leader. I think it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o a professional person in that subject in future. It shows that it is plausible for ever...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64483627204 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80206746523 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511335012594 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6542227906 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0526315789 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109371530688 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429472477406 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701857813548 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770498101685 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311864872976 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.