The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line chart depicts the emission of acid precipitation over a period of 16 years in four different sectors in the UK. Overall, a much larger number of electricity, gas and water provision released an acid rain emissions in comparison with three remaining sectors, and domestic experienced the slowest number of emission.
In 1991, the number of electricity, gas and water provision started at 3.3 million tonnes, while the figure for transportation and communication stood at 0.7 million tonnes. From 1991 to 2003, electricity, gas and water provision seen a significant drop by 2.5 million tonnes, whereas transportation and communication was the only sector increased gradually until it had the same figure with electricity, gas and water provision at 0.8 million tonnes in 2003. After that, both of them decrease slightly in the late four years.
The emission of domestic and other industries did not change between 1991 and 1994 with 2.1 million tonnes and 0.6 million tonnes respectively, followed by a steadily went down in the next 11 years. After that, both of them stayed again at 1.2 million tonnes for other industries and 0.2 million tonnes for domestic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-08 | czefw13 | view | |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Mary L. | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | thanhnguyenqc1985@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 89
- Nowadays more and more people use online shopping Some people think it is a good development To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of three age groups for different TV programmes in a Europe contry in 2012 61
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
- What is pros and cons of using public transport 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91084513339 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5977875468 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.142857143 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18716088027 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943210769077 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643330913343 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130766548762 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525418845417 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.