Q: Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of young people's promotions has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that young workers are eligible to be in charge of high positions in the government, while others argue otherwise. I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that only old workers are suitable for crucial positions in the government do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that elderly people have a huge amount of knowledge, resulting from their previous experiences, which helps them to deal with some unpredicted situations with greater ease. This means that they have a multitude of experiences from their failures that can be invaluable resources for them to come up with solutions in various environments. Given these points, some people hold the view that youth workers should not be entitled to be promoted.
My opinion, however, is that young working adults deserve to take responsibility for high positions. Perhaps the most convincing reason is that they have a tendency to think more flexibly than the old generation as they are not conservative. This ability enables them to handle essential issues about their work more effectively. In addition, hiring young people of working age in high positions can exert a positive influence on a multitude of young adults. To provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for promotion opportunities for young employees, they would be less likely to become motivated, which can even cause them not to devote their time and energy to work. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that young people have the right to become promoted for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-04 | camille1104 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | bfun | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | dnthao2932018 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | nkninh | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
- Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- An interesting number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that young pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13271604938 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77334866372 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7846324015 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357345650061 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108068656443 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848077982408 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217917151339 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397803639034 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.