Some people feel the private lives of politicians, film stars, sports personalities and other well-known people should remain private; others say there are good reasons why they should not. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The private life of public figures has always come under scrutiny. Some people support the notion of publicising while others oppose the idea of revelation. From my point of view, I am inclined to advocate the need for one’s privacy.
It is the matter of fact that not only celebrities in particular but also each individual is entitled to secrecy. Discretion is the fundamental human right, therefore, it should be respected and the act of intrusion is more or less prohibited. Moreover, gaining attention as an A-lister does not impel the invasion of privacy. Well-known people have great responsibilities in the public eye, nonetheless, they remain as ordinary citizens behind the limelight. Career and personal life share no common ground, hence privacy should not have been put in the public domain.
On the opposing side of the matter, it is well worth mentioning that being in the middle of public attention is an inevitable part that celebrities enlist in. Without the exposure of personal matter, the public would not have known the reverse side of the famed world. In addition, the value that the stars embody is in fact influential to other people, simultaneously posing great impacts on one’s mindset, hence the disclosure is irrefutably vital. The enthusiasts are justified to be inquisitive about their role model, granted that unawareness of bad influence might evidently cause them to be mindless fanatics.
To draw a fair conclusion, although the revelation is at some points compulsory, the private life should not take the center-stage. Intrusive actions are highly reprehensible inasmuch as public figures deserve privacy.
- i 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example traveling to the Moon and to other planets However others disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on Earth Discus 89
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies 84
- i 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, in particular, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28136882129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92194871062 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9510451884 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174283982778 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521887034418 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492382626656 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101438358146 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300192146513 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.