The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following maps illustrate different changes that occurred in an island to provide facilities for tourists.
As can be clearly observed from the maps, the island witnesses various modifications, the most important of which takes place in the central region of the island where a remarkable number of residential tents are constructed. On the southern part of the island, a pier is developed to become a place that bouts can land. Despite other parts of the island, it seems that there are not significant improvements on the eastern section of the island.
Moreover, several accommodations alongside a number of footpaths between them are built in the western side of the island near the beach. In addition, between two residential sectors of the island, a restaurant and a reception center are constructed which a vehicle track road connects them to pier and also to each other.
It is clear from the maps that beside the beach a swimming area is developed in where tourists have the opportunity to enjoy the sea and lay in the sun’s golden light.
- As most people spend major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers give reasons for 84
- Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher To what extent do you agree 85
- Do you think that young people should be restricted on certain things that they can do such as driving or smoking until they reach the age of 25 What are your views on this 49
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries How far do you agree with this statement Use your own examples to support 69
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98305084746 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84268948822 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5388178069 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161164218731 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722411972896 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344867114009 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966278187818 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272048591975 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.