The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it remote to untouched natural areas. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging these natural areas?
In this modern, the population increases drastically all around the world, which leads to more demanding for oils and gases. In many areas where we find it; it untouched. To fulfil the demand of these sources to human beings drilling from the land is the best way. This essay will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of the argument and why it is superior, all the explanation described in the following paragraphs.
There are mainly two primary benefits of drilling these sources. It may be more adventurous for everyone. Firstly, it fulfilled the basic needs of oils and gases. If all countries have enough amount of natural sources, they will sell at favourable prices to their citizens. Secondly, it creates a lot of job opportunities for people and countries; for there trading businesses. Many nations will sell to many countries at a higher price, later they make a good amount of profits from it. For example, Dubai made 70% of its income from sold crude oil and natural gases to another nation in 2020.
Indeed, there are a number of people who will find jobs for and it more beneficial for growing nations too.
There are plenty of challenges will the world face, when we drilled out all-natural sources. The biggest risk of this is creat some environmental problems. When we started digging all places, which provides us with natural gases and oils, these land become infertile and many animals lost their food and homes. In addition, it may be possible reasons for humans to searching for a new alternative, because we face shortages of these important sources when we drilled out them. For example, there are 67% of animals become homeless because the government started to find more sources to fulfil the demands of citizens of the UAE In 2019. Therefore, it creates a lot of obstacles in the long run but it is the only possible way for mankind, that provides more positive impacts.
To conclude, the demand for oil and gases becoming higher every day. The drilling from untouched areas; is a possible way to supply to demands. Although it may be damage to other spicess’ habitats and the environment, it is more beneficial from a human perspective. In my words, to find more sources for our salves from land will no doubt provides more advantages than disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows men s and women s prize money at golf majors in 2010 90
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The maps provide a comparison of the town of Seatown and the changes it has witnessed from 1995 to the present day 82
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that products should be made to last as long as possible while others think making the products cheap is more important Discuss both views and express your own opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 69, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...es will the world face, when we drilled out all-natural sources. The biggest risk o...
^^^
Line 6, column 468, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...these important sources when we drilled out them. For example, there are 67% of an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90025575448 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66033833738 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511508951407 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0703207119 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209031226142 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605386782225 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378047623679 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115480543971 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420789967731 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.