Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime.
Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.
Do you agree or disagree?
According to the laws in Britain and Australia, the previous records of the person who is being charged of a crime cannot be revealed to the panel of judges who are involved in that particular case. However, some lawyers in those counties do not agree to this and wants a reform in this in order to make the judges more familiar about the past records of the person involved and give their judgement considering it.
The lawyers do have a valid point here and I would support to it as a person can only be clearly judges on the basis of his deeds. It is famously said that "Once a thief, is always a thief", thus habits of a person cannot be easily changed. When a person goes against the laws and regulation and commit a crime, then its unstoppable for him. He would continue doing it until some serious actions are taken against him. So, while a defendant is going through a case, by looking into the past records, the jury can judge the actions of the person and take actions according to it.
It has also been noticed that many times a person is charged with a fine for breaking regulations of the nation and is then free to go. This freedom makes him repeat his mistakes and which sometimes can make him do a bigger crime for which he has to be punished. In such cases, the criminal record helps to give a correct punishment to the criminal.
These days it is very easy to fabricate the evidences and prove a criminal not guilty of a crime, and in such cases it is very crucial for the judges to decide who is guilty and who is not. In order to give punishment to the actual criminal, these criminal records play a very important role. They can tell whether the person is capable of doing crimes or not.
In order to make the work of judges easier and precise, access to previous criminal records must be granted so that only wrong people will suffer and the justice will be given to the sufferers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | comTDK | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | anna103 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | anna103 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | vuthuy2210 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agree to this and wants a reform in this in order to make the judges more familia...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person cannot be easily changed. When a person goes against the laws and regulat...
^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... case, by looking into the past records, the jury can judge the actions of the pe...
^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of doing crimes or not. In order to make the work of judges easier and preci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, then, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42535211268 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3374850888 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49014084507 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9200361884 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312057032057 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991053952572 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559745925174 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169759647107 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632029851317 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.