the graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 to 2007
The supplied line chart provides how many tourists from overseas visited 3 different regions of tourist attractions, namely the coast, the mountains, and the lakes, in a European country from 1987 to 2007. In general, the majority of the foreign tourists spent time visiting the coast and the lakes, the opposite was the case for that of the mountains.
It can be observed that having accounted for the largest portion of the number of visitors at the outset, the coast experienced a slight decrease in quantity, at under 38 thousand people in 1992. Nevertheless, a notable jump in this figure was visible and 1997 was the first time its quantity of tourists surpassed that of the lake, at over 50 thousand people.
Meanwhile, in 1987, in spite of fewer than 10 thousand visitors in comparison with the mountains, the lakes witnessed a significant upswing in figure and peaked at over 72 thousand people in 2002, ending up at 50 thousand people in 2007. Besides, despite a minute increase in this figure from 1987 to 2007, the mountains came to the third-place attractive area out of three places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-25 | nhikhietman | 78 | view |
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- the graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 to 2007 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 87
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, nevertheless, so, third, while, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91443850267 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66727546979 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8214264763 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165366687301 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764657266861 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695655681166 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101386440959 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445270396331 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.