Some people think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is pay them based on how much they produce and sell do you agree or disagree and give your opinion?
One of the responsibilities of a manager is to motivate their employees to do more hard work. However, some people agree that it would be a right way to give salaries to an employee on their performance. This essay will discuss why people think in that way and why I disagree with these people, all the explanation is given in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, many people think that paying wages to workers on their performance would be an effective way. It may be increase a worker's performance, and they worked hard to archive more salaries. Ultimately, it improves the company's performance, sales, and profits. Google, for example, changed their policies for their employees, if employees do more to improve in their sales, they will give them an extra 25% of the money as a bonus on income to their employees in last year. Over 254 employees gained more wages after changes in policies. These types of evidence prove that why people think in this way and it will improve the overall performance of employees and profits of the company.
However, it would be not an effective way to basing wages on a worker's production and sales. In some cases, the performance of workers affected by external factors beyond their control such as the economy of the state, natural problems and political developments. Heavy rain, for example, damages all produced different vegetables on the farm, these types of cases, people not involves in a decrement of productions. Therefore, basing salaries figures on the overall performance, not a good idea. In most cases, it would demotivate the employees.
In my words, I totally disagree with the given statement. It would be not a relatively effective way, which may lead to unexpected outcomes.
To conclude, it is ultimately the manager's responsibilities to motivate their workers to improve their performance and provide them with more wages than measuring on worker’s sales.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | Jiyuu | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
- The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it remote to untouched natural areas Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging these natural areas 56
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 93
- If some people get a chance to choose between life without work and spending most of the time working then they would choose not to work Agree and disagree 89
- The bar chart shows men s and women s prize money at golf majors in 2010 90
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... an effective way. It may be increase a workers performance, and they worked hard to ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...t an effective way to basing wages on a workers production and sales. In some cases, th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, such as, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08463949843 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90206968068 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473354231975 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7654087997 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4117647059 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208154965679 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691993077463 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546351309946 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117302081542 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789904295272 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.