Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often asserted by a section of society that the worth of some crucial elements in life of a person such as happiness, relationships, respect cannot be measured in monetary terms. In this regard, the essay totally accords the notion since the merriment in life and the relationships that people share are always at no cost.
To commence with the principle cause of my opinion, inner peace of a person is outcome of one’s deeds and actions which offer gratification in life. However, this kind of situation is unachievable even by spending a hefty amount. Its best example would be the wealthy people, who are usually found in depression despite of the luxuries they enjoy. They feel that once they will buy everything from this world, contentment would be aside which is proven wrong in many cases as more the money people have, more the stressed and anxious they are found in order to hold or empower everything. Thus, happiness does not come with a price tag.
Apart from this, the relationships we have, either biologically or man-made, cannot be weighed in financial terms. The love and affection shown towards loved ones bound them with us, not the assets or favours that we do. Parents, for example, show selfless love to their children and in its return, they only expect the same. These emotions and gestures are beyond this materialistic world due to which importance of family and friends is utmost. Therefore, the pillars of one’s’ life are incomparable with anything in world.
To reiterate, it can be said that undoubtedly, everything today has a price tag on it, but, the human emotion and relationships are still an exception from this realm. Without these, the distinctive nature of humans being sensitive will vanish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | manshu_d | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | christy018 | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | sainikomal07@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | christy018 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | gillmandeep0260 | 87 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere to what extent do you agree 73
- The system used for rubbish garbage collection in your local area is not working properly This is causing problems for you and your neighbours Write a letter to the local council In your letter describe how the rubbish collection system is not working pro
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How can people achieve happiness 56
- You rented a car from a car rental company The air conditioner has stopped working You phoned the company a week ago but it still has not been repaired Write a letter to the company In your letter introduce yourself explain the situation say what action y 87
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday When you got home you realised you had left your wallet there Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend for the holiday explain that you left your wallet in their house give them ins 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...lways at no cost. To commence with the principle cause of my opinion, inner peace of a p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... love and affection shown towards loved ones bound them with us, not the assets or f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, kind of, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95578231293 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69636944117 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.401224896 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196583762027 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600532661173 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255375474234 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109939597606 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118669479298 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...lways at no cost. To commence with the principle cause of my opinion, inner peace of a p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... love and affection shown towards loved ones bound them with us, not the assets or f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, kind of, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95578231293 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69636944117 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.401224896 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196583762027 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600532661173 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255375474234 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109939597606 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118669479298 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.