Reducing working hours is an effective solution to reduce employment
Having a secure source of income has become an arduous task in this modern world. Since the rate of unemployment surged, some developing countries face a serious crisis. I believe that reducing working hours to thirty-five per week is an effective solution. This essay will not only highlight the limitations of this approach but also describe the advantages that outweigh the disadvantages.
To commence with, there are some merits of this approach at the top of that is employee get time to relax. To be precise, nowadays every person spends ample hours in the workspace. Due to which they do not get enough time to spend with their family. Likewise, if working hours will be reduced, people can able to spend more time with their children. To epitome, in the UK various studies concluded that people who spend most of their time at work have higher stress levels as they do not get adequate time to relax and do not involve in physical activities.
On the other hand, despite having advantages there are some drawbacks of this approach, the pay scale alters according to working hours. To elaborate, the company will pay wages according to hours which a person utilises in their organisation. Likewise, if the hours will be reduced for the job, the wages will be reduced simultaneously. As a result, workers not able to fulfil their desires because of insufficient salary.
To conclude, although there are few limitations of reducing working hours, the merits outweigh the demerits. Hence, reducing works hours to generate more jobs are not an appropriate to measure to reduce the unemployment rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | Manvir singh | 73 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of spending in five countries in three product groups 92
- Reducing working hours is an effective solution to reduce employment 73
- The first graph shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by the farm each month in 2013 and also almost in tonnes of fertilizer used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month 84
- The charts below show the household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 89
- Many people believe that education and high qualification will bring success Others think that it is not required to achieve success in life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01492537313 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70002846449 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548507462687 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1374242947 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285398699513 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104480205578 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138793395813 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209424647169 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126694052773 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.